|
Dr. David Johnson |
![]() About Dr. David Johnson |
![]() "Medical Tests That Can Save Your Life: 21 Tests Your Doctor Won't Order ... Unless YOU KNOW To Ask" |
Dearest: My guest tonight is David Johnson, Ph.D. an associate professor and Chairman in the Department of Physiology at the College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of New England, Biddeford, Maine. Dr. Johnson is the co-author with David Sandmire, M.D., of the new book, "Medical Tests That Can Save Your Life: 21 Tests Your Doctor Won't Order ... Unless YOU KNOW To Ask." Breakthrough medical tests can find dozens of deadly diseases before it's too late. But because of the state of modern healthcare (with insurers' red tape and doctors' busy schedules), most of us don't know that these tests are available let alone which ones to have, what they're called or how to ask them. That's all about to change. Dr. Johnson, it's a pleasure to welcome you to Power Surge. Dr. David Johnson: I'm very happy to be here. Dearest: Dr. Johnson, you say in your book, "According to a recent study, one in three doctors withholds information from his patients that could benefit them. In particular, this means that these doctors may not tell their patients about screening tests that could detect potentially fatal diseases in early, treatable stages." Can you share with us WHY any doctor would withhold this type of information from a patient, especially if the doctor is aware that the patient might be able to avoid serious health problems? Dr. David Johnson: One of the reasons, unfortunately, is that if they know the patient's insurance company won't cover that procedure and they know the patient they can't afford it, they might might conclude that it's best just not to discuss it. Another reason is that they may believe personally that the procedure or the test is of no value to that particular patient's condition. Finally, the HMO that that patient belongs to may not allow the doctor to discuss that procedure because they don't pay for it. Dearest: I have a condition called Costochondritis and requested of my HMO family practitioner to have a digital mammogram instead of a regular mammogram because of the pain to the breast bone. My doctor refused. He said the HMO wouldn't pay for it. I called my HMO's executive offices and got them to agree that I could have it. Do patients often have to go beyond their doctors to get what they need? Dr. David Johnson: That's very true. Patients very often need to go beyond their doctor to look out for their best interest. Your doctor is very busy, may not know everything there is to know about that particular condition, and is under financial constraints to contain the cost of treating it. Gramz: What do you think of the C-Reactive Protein and Homocysteine for a postmenopausal patient? Do you feel these are beneficial test when cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL and HDL are normal? Dr. David Johnson: The answer to that is a definite yes for the C-Reactive Protein and possibly yes for the plasma homocysteine. A high plasma level of C-Reactive protein is definitely a risk factor for coronary heart disease independent of cholesterol. Dearest: Something that seriously concerns me is that doctors are given "test results" by a laboratory, and included are values or normal and abnormal ranges. However, often those results are only numbers and I've personally experienced more than one doctor who looked at abnormal test results and said, "Everything is fine." I know because I followed up after seeing the results myself. Do you think doctors are always educated enough about test results, or perhaps patients should be discussing their test results directly with the physicians at the lab. Dr. David Johnson: Normal lab values are only averages. What's normal for one person may not be normal for another person. The reality is the lab that does the test decides what's normal and what's abnormal on certain studies. What some labs consider normal compared to other labs varies throughout the US. So the moral to this story is that any lab value that's in the high range of normal should be considered suspicious if other factors suggest disease is present. Dearest: Isn't it possible to have "universal" ranges? Dr. David Johnson: Medical laboratories are standardized, but some labs will consider a normal value to be different from another lab because they may be using information from more recent studies. AnnieOakl: Is there a way to make the HMO or insurance company pay for tests we want/need? Or do we just keep bugging them until they approve a test? Dr. David Johnson: You can often get them to approve a test if you can show you have above average risk factors for the disease that the test looks for. However, many tests are inexpensive and you would benefit more by paying to have the test done as opposed to not having it done simply because the HMO won't pay for it. AnnieOakl: Do I tell them or my doctor? Dr. David Johnson: You should ask your doctor first because if your doctor believes your situation warrants it, he or she may code the problem in such a way that the HMO will pay for it. GlendaS: If we are not being given the tests, treatments, pain relief that we should be getting, what can we do about this? Are there organizations to go to for help or are we stuck filing lawsuits? Dr. David Johnson: If you're not being given the tests, medications and pain relief that you should be getting, that could be due to several factors. One of these is that your doctor simply is not aware of the fact that the test exists, that the test is of any value, or that you're experiencing clinical pain beyond what's acceptable. The other possibility is that your doctor knows about the tests but simply doesn't think your HMO will pay for it, or doesn't know how much information it can provide and therefore, simply doesn't order it. In the case of pain, if you're telling your doctor that you're in pain and he or she refuses to change or increase your pain medication, you need a new doctor. Keep in mind that in this book what we're advocating is using specific conventional medical tests in unconventional ways. In particular, the tests that we discuss in this book. In other words, the tests that we are discussing in this book are generally used only to diagnose or stage disease in a person who already has symptoms of the disease. These tests are abnormal in many cases long before symptoms appear. If you are at high risk for the diseases we discuss and choose to have the tests done before you have symptoms and find that you in fact have the disease, your chance for a cure or a good prognosis will be greater. Dearest: Which brings me to a question about the full body CT scan, which has become very popular lately among those who can afford it. However, you don't endorse it for everyone. Under what circumstances will you recommend or not recommend a full body CT scan? Dr. David Johnson: I would recommend a fully body CT scan under NO circumstances. This is what I call a true fishing expedition. It's much more effective to examine specific parts of your body for disease based on your risk factors than to take a "spray the infield approach: with high doses of radiation in the hopes of finding a cancer in the early stages. This is particularly true in people who do not have family histories or risk factors for cancer. Finally, a very recent study confirmed that the doses of radiation received in a full body CT scan are equivalent to the doses received in some atomic bomb survivors. MaryO: Dr. Johnson, I had a rare disease. I did a lot of research and asked doctors to test me for it, yet none did. Even though it was "rare", it doesn't mean that no one gets it. How can we get doctors to test for these rare diseases, especially when a patient has done the research and has many symptoms? I wasted years before my diagnosis and surgery. Dr. David Johnson: What is the disease you're referring to? MaryO: Cushing's disease caused by a pituitary tumor. Dr. David Johnson: Cushing's isn't all that rare. The definitive test to diagnose Cushing's disease cost less than $100. MaryO: According to the doctors I saw over several years it was too rare to get. Dr. David Johnson: Missing Cushing's disease is inexcusable. If you have a worry about a specific disease, you're educated about that disease, and the test for the disease is accurate, low or no risk and inexpensive, there's simply no excuse for not testing for the presence of the disease, especially if any clinical symptoms are already present. MaryO: That's what I thought, too, especially when I asked to be tested. Stella0324: Dr. Johnson, Do you recommend a colonoscopy for everyone over 50 as a screening test? I'd much prefer to avoid it if I can but still worry about missing cancer, should I have a virtual colonoscopy? Dr. David Johnson: Everyone should in fact get a screening colonoscopy, a full colonoscopy, not a sigmoidoscopy at age 50. Colonoscopy remains the gold standard for detecting colon cancer and its precursor, pre-cancerous polyps. Virtual colonoscopy has a lot or promise, but is still not as effective as a full colonoscopy for preventing and detecting colon cancer. If anyone in your family has had colon cancer, you should have a full colonoscopy in your 40s. Dearest: What's the difference between a colonoscopy and a virtual colonoscopy? Dr. David Johnson: A virtual colonoscopy is a very effective radiographic study of the colon. Unlike a barium enema, it much more easily tolerated and is in fact an alternative to people who simply cannot tolerate a regular colonoscopy. However, studies have shown that the colonoscopy remains your best bet for detecting early colon cancer, precancerous polyps. Gramz: What about colonoscopy? My mother had colon cancer at 49 years of age. Today she is 81. I am 53 and my doctor said since my colonoscopy was clear 4 years ago that she thinks just a sigmoid is needed this time. I think I should push for a colonoscopy with a gastroenterologist. Do you agree? Dr. David Johnson: Sigmoidoscopies miss 60 percent of all colon cancers. They only examine the first two feet or so of the colon. And only 40 percent of all colon cancers occur within the reach of the sigmoidoscopy, therefore, you absolutely should insist on having a full colonoscopy and do not give in on this one. Dearest: Power Surge is a community for women at midlife in all phases of menopause. What tests do you think are essential for women in this age group? Dr. David Johnson: Definitely the tests we describe in the book for evaluating risk of coronary heart disease. In addition, you should absolutely have a baseline DEXA scan to evaluate bone density. If you have a strong family history of breast cancer based on the criteria that we describe in the book, you should consider BRCA genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer. This is also true if you have a strong family history of ovarian cancer because having a BRCA gene mutation greatly increases the risk of ovarian cancer in addition to breast cancer. Finally, if you have long history of smoking, you should read the chapter on spiral CT scanning for the presence of early lung cancer. Twink1: Hello Dr. Johnson. My partner has hepatitis C, chronic fatigue, type 2 diabetes, polycythemia vera (PV), and nerve damage in his legs. He has had MRI's CT scans, several blood tests and we are not getting anywhere as far as treatment goes, except for the PV, which he takes Hydroxyurea for. Are there any other tests you could suggest? And/or would you recommend Interferon/combo treatment? He is in chronic pain, bedridden 24/7, no quality of life. Thanks Dr. David Johnson: The diseases you described have varying degrees of symptomology and are all relatively treatable by an experienced physician. His neuralgia or leg pain as you know is almost certainly due to his diabetes which, if is not under control, should be referred to an endocrinologist. His hepatitis C is also generally manageable depending on which stage of the disease he's in. This particular disorder should definitely be evaluated by an experienced gastroenterologist. Finally, if he hasn't already seen one the PV should be evaluated by a hematologist. You primary care physician should provide him with these referrals if your quality of life is not good. JaneJ: Dr. Johnson, what are some of the other tests you feel are essential? Dr. David Johnson: The answer to that question is dependent on your risk factors. When you read the book you'll be able to evaluate your individual risk for many serious diseases that are common to both men and women as we age. In addition to those that are much more common only to post-menopausal women. So for example, if you have someone in your family that's ever had an abdominal aortic aneurysm you definitely should have an abdominal ultrasound; however, a woman with no family history of an abdominal aortic aneurysm does not necessarily need this screening test. I might add having an occasional abdominal or pelvic ultrasound will pick up liver, gall bladder and kidney problems as well. Loon777: I am 61 years old, had a colonoscopy last year, had one polyp removed, all was ok, next one will be done in 5 years. If you have one polyp or more removed, are there chances of more developing over the 5 years? Dr. David Johnson: Was it a pre-cancerous polyp or not? Loon777: Pre-cancerous Dr. David Johnson: I would suggest you have another one in three years because they can grow back. Loon777: At least I think it was, they said it was nothing to worry about. Dr. David Johnson: Then it probably was not pre-cancerous, which is why they recommended re-examine in five years. I would ask your doctor to confirm whether it was pre-cancerous or not. If it was, ask to be re-examined in three years. Loon777: Oh ok. My Dad had colon cancer and was cured and lived another 15 years after and died of a heart attack. Dr. David Johnson: 90 percent of colon cancers are sporadic and not due to genetic predisposition. So the chances are your dad's colon cancer was not genetically predisposed, especially if he got it when he was over 50 years of age. Dearest: Dr. Johnson, if doctors don't stay on top of the most current medical information and tests, how can patients be expected to know everything? Many women (and men) take their doctors' word as almost God-like. Why should doctors have to be educated by their patients? Dr. David Johnson: Like you, your doctor is only human. Medical science and medical therapy are evolving at an extremely high rate and doctors who are overwhelmed with patients and paperwork simply cannot be expected to be completely updated on all medical information, and in fact, are not. Therefore, you should work with your doctor as your partner in your healthcare. And as a partner you would be wise to provide your doctor with information about your particular medical history, lifestyle, or symptoms so that the best possible outcome can be obtained for a problem that might exist. Gramz: My sister was diagnosed with mastocytosis 8 years ago and today has mast cell leukemia (she is only 63). Do you know anything about this disease? I understand it to be fairly rare? Or is it something my children and I should be concerned about? Dr. David Johnson: It's highly unlikely that she or her children need to be concerned about it, but the definitive answer and peace of mind will come if she has a consult arranged with a hematologist. Gramz: She is in a protocol at NIH as well as being seen at UC Davis medical center. Dr. David Johnson: The question that you just put to me should be put to your sister's hematologist at UC Davis who I think will assure you this is unlikely to be a problem for you. Dearest: In your book you talk about the "etiquette of gathering your family health history." Can you elaborate on the easiest way of going about this? Dr. David Johnson: First of all, make sure that family members realize that you're gathering this history only because it could make the difference in your own personal health and secondly, and even more importantly, when a family member tells you that grandpa, let's say, died of lymphoma for example, that you get the hospital records to confirm it was in fact lymphoma and what type of lymphoma. I say this based on my own experience. I was told for years that my grandmother died of leukemia. I solicited her medical records and found that she in fact died of Non- Hodgkin's lymphoma. So oftentimes family members may think they know the cause of death of a family member, but in fact may be mistaken. The only sure way to know is to ask for the medical records that you are in fact entitled to. RadTravler: As mammographer, patients frequently ask about Estrogen and breast cancer. What are your thoughts on this? Dr. David Johnson: Estrogen replacement therapy, especially when used for more than ten years does in fact cause a slight increase in the lifetime risk for acquiring breast cancer. However, this slight increase in risk was thought to be overruled by the benefit of estrogen in preventing heart disease. Recent studies, particularly the Women's Health Initiative, have seriously questioned the putative benefits of post- menopausal estrogen in preventing heart disease, although the stated benefits in preventing osteoporosis still remain strong. Therefore, choosing to use estrogen replacement therapy in post-menopausal women should be only after consulting with a knowledgeable gynecologist who's familiar with your particular family history and the latest research. AnnieOakl: Dr., how do you solicit medical records? Do you need a lawyer or what? Do you have to know your relative's doctor or hospital? My family is hesitant to give out info and I suspect heart or alcohol related deaths. Dr. David Johnson: Most hospitals require that the closest family member to the deceased give permission to release the records. This is usually adequate. If for some reason that family member refuses to give permission to release the medical records and you believe that could impact your health, the next step should be contact a lawyer, although this is very unlikely to be necessary. Dearest: Dr. Johnson, do you have any closing comments you'd like to share with us. Dr. David Johnson: Dr. Sandmire and I wrote this book because we recognized the fact that so many serious diseases once confirmed by medical tests have a very poor outcome. The fact of the matter is these same tests used to diagnose the disease after symptoms are present would have detected the disease when the person was asymptomatic and would have had a much better outcome. So we're not advocating everyone run out and have medical testing for various diseases while they're asymptomatic. What we are advocating is that you learn how to evaluate your personal risk for serious diseases and if you find that you are in fact at high risk, that you take advantage of the medical tests that can find these diseases prior to the appearance of symptoms when the chance of cure or good prognosis is much higher. Dearest: Dr. Johnson, thank you for joining us in Power Surge tonight to share information about medical tests we need to protect our health. I strongly recommend Dr. Johnson's book, Medical Tests That Can Save Your Life: 21 Tests Your Doctor Won't Order.... Unless You Ask. Disclaimer: Every guest in Power Surge is a highly respected professional whose opinions are his/her own. An appearance in Power Surge does not constitute an endorsement of a guest's views. None of these transcripts may be reprinted or reproduced without the express permission of Power Surge™ and the respective guest. Read other transcripts by returning to the Library. Dearest aka Alice Stamm Power Surge Founder, Facilitator, Host Copyright©1994-2009 by Power Surge. All Rights Reserved.